I wanted to measure the propagation delay through a single SN7402 TTL NOR gate. For this, I used the same conditions as specified by the
manufacturer so as to make comparison with regards to the manufacturer’s specifications. The circuit is shown below:
At its input, I connected a function generator as a 5Vpk step function. The signals were measured both at the input and the output. I got the following result:
For ON to OFF transition at the output of the NOR:
For OFF to ON transition at the output of the NOR:
This would give me the results as:
Propagation
delays as measured
td
(nS)
|
tf (nS)
|
ts (nS)
|
tr (nS)
|
tPHL=td
+tf/2 (nS)
|
tPLH=ts
+tr/2 (nS)
|
6
|
12.4
|
15
|
28
|
12.2
|
29
|
I repeated the experiment with the CL removed, I got the following results:
tPLH
|
3.2 nS
|
tPHL
|
10 nS
|
Note: For the second case, tPLH and
tPHL were determined by measuring midpoints of transition between
input and output waveforms.
Now, comparing with the datasheet, we have:
|
As Measured
|
From Datasheet
|
|
With
CL
|
|
tPLH
|
12.2
nS
|
8
– 15 nS
|
tPHL
|
29
nS
|
12
– 22 nS
|
|
Without
CL
|
|
tPLH
|
3.2
nS
|
8
– 15 nS
|
tPHL
|
10
nS
|
12
– 22 nS
|
With the use of load capacitance CL, the measured values for tPLH and tPHL
were more than the range in the datasheet. Removing the load capacitor improved the result (and also well within the
datasheet). I believe the previous measurement was likely affected by the experimental
setup, mainly the input capacitance of the oscilloscope. Besides, parasitic capacitances due
to other setups like between leads, breadboard connections would have added up with that of the load effecting the total propagation delay.
No comments:
Post a Comment